Posts Tagged ‘Permanente medicine’

Health care coverage for workers’ families didn’t come easy

posted on January 16, 2011

By Ginny McPartland 

Affordable health care was an elusive commodity in 1930s America. Medical practice was becoming more sophisticated, and qualified doctors were in great demand. Consequently, private professional care was out of reach for many Americans. Employer-sponsored health plans started to spring up in the late 1930s and early 1940s, but even those progressive prepaid plans were slow to add workers’ families to the coverage.  

In 1944, during World War II, the issue of family health care reached a critical point on the West Coast. War industry yards and plants were frantically producing ships, aircraft, tanks and other war materiel; thousands of migrant workers and their families flooded rapidly expanding communities. Many workers were sick when they arrived, and many became injured as they worked at breakneck speed to meet production deadlines. 

Permanente medicine, developed by industrialist Henry J. Kaiser and enterprising physician Sidney Garfield, was launched to take care of workers in Kaiser’s West Coast shipyards. The two had done this before: Garfield had set up a prepaid plan for workers on the Los Angeles Aqueduct project in 1933, and he and Kaiser had teamed up to care for workers at the Grand Coulee Dam in Washington state in the late 1930s. 

The Kaiser-Garfield prepaid, group practice plan for shipard workers was progressive and exemplary by all accounts. Unlimited medical care for the individual workers was provided for 50 cents per week. But Garfield and his doctors had their hands full, so initially only the worker – not the family members – was covered by the health plan. 

Young patient seen in Fontana Kaiser Steel plant clinic

Stuart Lester of “Medical Economics,” writes in the February 1944 issue: “The principal threat to the permanence of the Permanente Foundation – which provides virtually unlimited medical care for 130,000 Kaiser shipyard workers in two states* is the workers’ complaint that it makes no provision for their families.” 

The article continues: “The family problem is especially acute in the shipyard town of Richmond, Calif., where the ratio of physicians to population is something like 1 to 4,000 and where the only hospital facilities of any consequence are those provided by Kaiser’s Richmond Field Hospital.” 

In Richmond, Portland (Oregon) and Vancouver (Wash.), nonsubscriber family members were treated for a fee.  Office visits were $2.25. For maternity, $200 covered prenatal care, delivery, hospitalization, C-section if required, postnatal care, and care for the newborn. Employees at the Kaiser Fontana steel plant in Southern California were the exception. In 1944, Fontana workers could purchase complete coverage for a family of four for $1.80 a week. 

Physicians debate how to cover families 

“Medical Economics” writer Lester refers to three possible solutions proposed at the time: an expansion of the Permanente plan to include family members; an expansion into the Richmond area by the California Physicians’ Services (CPS) prepaid plan as operating in other war industry communities; or the development of a prepaid arrangement for families through a private physician network. 

The California Medical Association (CMA) launched the CPS in 1939 to offer prepaid care to low-income families in California. Initially, the physicians association’s plan offered a “full coverage contract” that included all outpatient physician services. In 1942, CPS excluded the first two doctor visits from coverage to make the plan financially viable, according to the April 1943 issue of the CMA’s “California and Western Medicine.” In 1943, CPS, the precursor to Blue Shield, had 39,000 commercial members, 5,100 government rural health program subscribers and a total of 32,000 war housing resident members in Vallejo, Marin, Los Angeles and San Diego. 

Permanente Richmond Field Hospital

“Dr. Sidney R. Garfield, Kaiser’s medical director, sees two obstacles to an extension of his program to include families: One is opposition by the local medical societies. The other is lack of facilities – particularly in the hospital at Richmond,” Lester wrote in “Medical Economics.” The article noted that expansions of the Richmond Field Hospital and the Permanente Foundation Hospital in Oakland were under way. 

The second proposal – having CPS provide family coverage for Richmond area workers – had been tried previously and failed. In 1942, CPS  had offered a family plan in nearby El Cerrito and was not able to attract enough members. The coverage for non-Kaiser workers was enticing: a $5 flat fee no matter how many family members. It wasn’t practical for Kaiser employees, however.  To take advantage of the CPS plan, a worker would have to buy his or her own coverage for $2.16 a month and then pay $5 for the rest of the family. 

According to the “Medical Economics” article, solving of the family care issue by fee-for-service doctors was doomed from the beginning.  A shortage of private doctors and inadequacy of medical facilities made any such plan unfeasible.  Also, California private practice physicians were admittedly just tolerating the Permanente model of prepaid, group practice with salaried physicians. One private doctor told the magazine: “The Kaiser-Garfield groups are doing a job right now that is aiding the war effort, and are doing it well. But we don’t like their system.” 

Kaiser extends coverage to shipyard families 

In the spring of 1945, the Permanente medical plan, now with expanded facilities to accommodate more members, was extended to the families of all Kaiser shipyard workers. “Medical Economics” reported the details of the Permanente family care plan: for $117 a year ($2.25 per week) for a family of four, coverage was extensive. It included 111 days of hospitalization, complete diagnostic services, necessary drugs, physician services at home or medical office, major and minor surgery, and ambulance service within a 30-mile radius. Members paid an extra charge of $60 for comprehensive maternity care, $15 for a tonsillectomy and $2 for a house call. 

“Medical Economics” concluded the article with this statement: “Insurance men pointed out that the total annual cost for a family of four, $117 a year, is an amount which has generally proved to be too high for any wide participation on a voluntary basis.” 

Workers who left the shipyards could maintain coverage for a “slightly higher” premium as long as they continued to live in the service area. This retention provision foreshadowed Kaiser and Garfield’s plans to keep the Permanente medical care plan alive after the war industries shut down. 

*Kaiser shipyards health plan actually took care of workers in three states, California, Washington and Oregon, and enrolled up to 190,000 members at the peak of the war.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CAREER SATISFACTION AS A PERMANENTE PHYSICIAN

posted on September 17, 2009

The following vignette comes from the desk of Samuel Sapin, MD, who writes on physician freedom and the bonds of mutual trust and affection that he found in nearly a half-century of practice in Permanente medicine.

sam-sapin-mdRecent reports indicate that doctors are retiring early.  Having wearied of administrative burdens and insurance company requirements, they are not experiencing the professional satisfaction they had hoped for when they chose to practice medicine.

On August 1, 1955, 54 years ago, I joined the Southern California Permanente Medical Group, leaving a potentially lucrative pediatric practice on Park Avenue in Manhattan mainly because I disliked the business aspect of practice and the inability of my uninsured patients to receive necessary care.  With Permanente, I first practiced general pediatrics in Los Angeles for four years, and then pediatric cardiology from 1959 until I retired in 2000.

Becoming a Permanente physician was one of the most important decisions of my life.  It gave me the opportunity to treat my patients in a manner consistent with my professional knowledge and training regardless of medical care costs, and the opportunity to build warm and trusting relationships that have endured these many years.  This was brought home to me this summer after I received phone calls from three former patients.

The first call was from an 18-year-old girl who had been my patient from birth and found to have a severe cardiac abnormality, a single ventricle.  With love from her devoted parents and family, and after early surgery and implantation of a pacemaker subsequently, she has been living the life of a healthy teenager.  She called this summer to tell me, proudly, that she had just been accepted into the freshman class at UCLA. I felt honored that she wanted to share her good news with me.

The second call was from a 45-year-old woman, also my patient from birth.  In her teens, although asymptomatic, my physical examination revealed evidence of an abnormal, prolapsed mitral valve.  She then left Los Angeles to attend college and changed her health insurance plan.  She subsequently had a career and a child of her own, and would occasionally call me as she got older to update me on her condition.  On this latest call, she was now becoming fatigued and her cardiologist advised surgical correction of her valve, now leaking. I supported his decision.  The valve was then repaired surgically and did not have to be to be replaced.  Her husband and family helped care for her child, and I was kept informed about her progress during and after surgery. All went well.

The third call was also from a former patient, Denise Dalto, now 57 years old.  She is a remarkable woman with a devoted husband, Bob Dalto, two loving elder parents, two children, and two grandchildren.  I first saw her when she was five years old (52 years ago) and made a diagnosis, confirmed by cardiac catheterizations, of coarctation (narrowing) of her aorta with associated abnormalities of her aortic valve and blood vessels going to her head and arms.  Surgery to correct the coarctation was performed at age 14, but repair of the blood vessels was deemed too difficult to repair safely in those years.  Since then she has led a very active life, including hiking, traveling and teaching.  For 34 years, she successfully taught school children in public schools from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, who had been unable to reach their academic potential and required teachers with special abilities.

Denise informed me on this call that recent imaging studies showed that one of the abnormal blood vessels in her neck was enlarging and in danger of rupture.  After much deliberation by denise-dalto-with-school-childrensurgeons at the Kaiser Foundation Hospital in Los Angeles, surgery though somewhat risky, was advised.  It would involve four different surgical and radiological specialties, and three operations within one month, a daunting prospect for even a brave patient.  She phoned to ask my opinion about the proposed surgery.  After investigation, I reassured her about the skills of the physicians involved, and she underwent the three procedures.  All were carefully planned and all went well.  A remarkable recovery followed, with a return to her normal, very active lifestyle. Before her surgery, she retired from her teaching position.  One of her colleagues took the photo here of Denise, her pupils gathered around her to say good-bye and wish her well.

These phone calls within a space of weeks, from three former patients, made me realize more than ever, how fortunate I was to have joined the Permanente medical group.  The Kaiser Permanente physician, over a lifetime of practice, has a wonderful opportunity to develop these personal bonds, which in retirement, gives one a great sense of professional fulfillment and the feeling of a life well spent.

– Sam Sapin, MD, SCPMG pediatric cardiologist (retired) and Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology,  David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA

Ms. Dalto gave her consent for the release of her story.

Tags: , , , ,